A Tale To Tell & Remember

I'm very much inspired by the words of Thomas L. Friedman in his book "The World Is Flat" which renders about the influence of bloggers in this new age. I want to keep the highest integrity and honesty in posting my words to the world. This blog act as a testimony to my alacrity of sharing information with the borderless world. Hope we can share a high regards of veracity and chivalry with this blog because that's why it is here. So help me God!

Visit Malaysia

Visit Malaysia
Malaysia Truly Asia

Tuesday, 29 April 2008

KJ embezzling trust

29th April 2008 - Somebody saw KJ in Plaza Damansara today [here]. And why I am not surprise? Angah drove Ustaz Firdaus Ismail last Saturday to the airport, and he told me that ustaz said it is "hukumnya wajib" for us to oust KJ from UMNO. For the moment, I don't give a damn about this UMNO gangrene. I need a break and need to finish my research paper on Iran Hostage Crisis 1979. Tonight I'll be going back to Machang, Kelantan. On Express Wau Bulan! Wait for my article about it. For the time being, geronimooooooooo!

Monday, 28 April 2008

Be ready for stagflation anytime soon!

28th April 2008 - I believe we are now in “de fact” mode that out country is in a state of stagflation. I'm predicting a hard time for all Malaysian especially in consumer spending looking at the oil prices that might and will reach USD$150.00 per barrel in two months time and all hell will break loose in July/ September 2008.

The current situation in U.S. might transpire anytime soon in Malaysia where people don't drive anymore to go to the consumer stores/ outlets/ hypermarkets which will result in stagnant economy and inflate the basic necessities (such as happening now) surely affecting our consumer spending. When the crude oil reach USD$150 per barrel in two months time such things will surely come into reality:

1) The collapse of air travel where people couldn't afford anymore to spend in air travels either it be Air Asia or MAS (to say that such air carrier still can contain the upsurge of the oil prices would be wishful thinking) and this will bring to the collapse of those two airlines systems alongside its hundred thousand of employee and support staffs;

2) The dwindling of the tourism industry where people don’t travel anymore and this will further stagnant the hotel industry bringing down its hundred thousand of employees and support staffs;

3) The “beggar thy neighbour policy” adopted by the neighbouring countries such as Thailand and Vietnam which banned the agricultural products exports will only aggravate the negative impacts of consumer spending and contributes towards the spiralling price increase;

4) Unsustainable petrol and diesel subsidy (it ain't logic for the government to keep on subsidizing the petrol and diesel which had reached triple psychological barrier since 2006). The first psychological barrier was USD$60 per barrel, second was USD$100 per barrel and third will be USD$150 per barrel;

5) There will be a swelling of non-performing loans (NPL) which will instigate banks to adopt credit crunch regimes and further escalating our consumer spending problems;

6) Our friends in BPDN and BPGK surely will be in full hands 24/7 in countering such unsustainable problems and may God help them in such a holy endeavour. Perhaps triple the current problems since the triple effect of the psychological barrier; and

7) I’m predicting a percentage increase of marital problems, suicidal case, surrendering of cars to banks and job retrenchments come six months after the first economic explosion somewhere in January/ February 2009.

Such economic problems will only be add up by further damaging policy which will see more downcast of the consumer spending woes such as:-1) The cancellation of the infrastructure projects that will further sluggish/ damage the nations economy especially in bringing to a standstill of the previous economic plans;

2) The absentee of the new innovative products which can be marketed and can contributes an upward trend of the consumer spending (such as in consumer electrical appliances in 1980’s, computers in 1990’s, hand phones and high tech gadgets that play a major part in kicking our economy);

3) The sub-prime crisis in United States which will sink/ counter effect the positive fiscal policy attempt by the Third World Countries in mitigating the problems;

4) The lack of domestic investment house in Malaysia such as Morgan Stanley/ Greenhill and Co./ Rostchilds & Sons) that can play a vital role in advising Malaysian in risk management facing the impending financial problems; and

5) No political will in addressing this issues (forgive me if I’m wrong but I haven’t seen any) My advise to you all on things that we can do in managing the upcoming economic crisis:-1) Put a halt first in any intention of investments such as buying assets such as cars, lands or house. At least not until 2010/ 2011 when the default's subsides. The best investment at the moment is to buy government bonds, but pity I didn’t see any efforts from the government itself to introduce any.

2) I believe it is the best time to strengthen our family values and mend back the fences because unlike from other nations, Malaysian can refer/ seek or go back to their family in seeking financial help when financial problems occurs (such things will surely help to mitigate the internal economic problems);

3) One of methods for us to deal with these economic woes is to consider car pool or utilizing the public transport since people cannot afford anymore to travel by their own cars. Start to identify friends that can car pool with you. Personally I believe when the oil hit USD$150 dollar per barrel some of us may have to travel by motorbike and bicycle (no kidding) all the way to work;

4) The best way perhaps is not subsidising more, but perhaps when such things hit us, we can introduce cuts in public transport charge perhaps for layman, pensioners and the re-introducing of the free food programmes in schools;

5) The most important of all is that for us not to panic and not to live in fear, thus fear will only worsen the situation. We have to be cautious in spending and live life as usual but prudent and don't take things for granted anymore. I'm predicting we'll be in economic problems in three months times and the latest is in July or September 2008.

I’ve cut myself clear on this one; call me pessimist or having a dark cloud over me, but I don't make up the data, merely just interpret it and being realistic, at least somebody warn you before it happens. Just follow the oil trail.

Feel free to mail me should any question arise from this email. Let's hope and pray that I'm wrong on this one and I’m surely wanted to be dead wrong on this one! - By: AHMAD SYAH EJAZ BIN HJ. ISMAIL.

Saturday, 26 April 2008

Aah! Letter from Sir Tim Hatton

Sir Tim's letter to me
Updated: 27th April 2008

Sir Tim Hatton was no doubt is one of the best British Officer that Her Majesty Government had offered us especially during our hard time prior and after our nation Independence. He had treated our peoples as his own and had given everything to see Malaysia get back on its track after the war. He had served in all over part of Malaysia and had seen a lot of political changes in Malaysia and the world.

Sir Tim had served with the best (He was the officer in charge of the Gurkha’s Rifles in India during the partition and was in charge to protect the Muslim and Hindu caravan) and He was the person in charge in the inceptions of VAT 69 (Malaysian similar to British SAS), and the renowned Malaysian Special Branch. The Communist terrorist even though hate the European so much but still respect him and one of the proof was that when he was consulted by two renegade CT’s to surrender Ah Kuk (one of the prominent CT’s leader in Communist Central Committee in Malaya) personally.

A lot of his close friends had died during the emergency and he knew Sir Gerald Templer personally. In his letter to me which I quote:-

"Sometimes, [when] I think of the battles [that] we fought there (Malaya) during the Emergency, I always see the faces of those who were killed, or wounded, and their families"

Not many knew that Sir Tim also was the officer in charge to open up a back channel for the Indonesian government to negotiate with Tun Dr. Ismail (Malaysia Internal Affairs Minister) in ending up the Indonesian Confrontation.

We indeed owed so much for what these peoples which had given their life to us (Sir Tim and friends alike), and I admit that if its not because of these guys, we wouldn't be in peace and stable as we are today. He loved every part of Malaya that he was been assigned too (Kulim, Sg. Petani, Bukit Mertajam, Jeli, Seremban, Kuala Lumpur and many parts of the old Malaya). And I felt a little bit nostalgic when I delve into his personal account of his experiences especially in the northern part of Malaya. I love this guy!

I quote his letter:-

"But I'm sure today, they (friends and families who died during the Emergency), are all very proud of the way your generations has consolidated the way of the nations and the lives expectations of the Bumiputeras [that] have significantly improved".


Sir Tim Hatton, KBE, OBE - 19th April 2008

This man is a living legend in Malaysia history. It is an honour to get acquainted with him and I’m sure we’ll meet again somewhere Sir Tim. God bless you Sir Tim Hatton.

Old posting:-

26th April 2008 - I received a letter from Sir Tim Hatton today. Sir Tim currently resides in Salisbury, England and was the former director of the Malaysian Special Branch during the emergency and post-emergency period and he had given his everything including his life during that hard time. I promise to share the letter with you all and it is an honour to have his handwriting letter in my possession. I salute you Sir Tim Hatton!

By the way, Dato' Mukhriz dined at my grandpa's today and it was a misfortune for me that I couldn't join him in Machang. But however, something’s very interesting is coming and let's pray to God that it will be good.

Monday, 21 April 2008

A bloody damn joke

I just read a bloody damn good joke for today. [here] What do you expect from that man? I've raised the issue of the double railway project to one of the IDB board of directors last year, and he said to me that steel price cause it to delay or canceled the project. I guess this one too will be answered by the same lame type of excuses. At the end of the day, we had nothing! But then again, I should ask this question, where all the ringgit gone cowboy?

Dr. M on BBC Hardtalk

Updated: 24th April 2008

Dr. Mahathir quote from BBC Hardtalk Interview:-

On the Anglo-Saxon race:
"The European use to call us lazy Malays, incompetent Malays, untrustworthy Malays, we couldn’t say a thing about you [the Anglo-Saxon race]. So when I was in the position to say what we think about you, and say it then and then you don’t like it. When you say it to us [what you think], you expect us to like it? We didn’t like it, but we didn’t have a way to make our voices heard."

On democracy:

"If you look at the history of the West, they come up with all kinds of ideologies and they use it for sometimes and they found it defective and then they dropped it and start on another. One day they will forget about democracy, because in some countries democracies actually end up in anarchy and they were practically no government. It’s not the system that can feed everybody. You must have a certain understanding of the limitation of democracy in order to make it work."

"The great civilization of the past did not have democracy and yet they became great. It’s not necessary the system that will work for everybody. If we had a bad leader even in the democratic system would fail. You must remember that it is a democratic country which dropped the atomic bomb and killing two hundreds thousand peoples."
Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad - 17th April 2008, BBC Hardtalk, London

Original posting:-

It's been a long time I heard something intellectual coming out from a Malay, a Muslim and a Malaysian, but tonight I held my heads high and feel proud for 30 minutes. Thank Allah we still have one soul who dare to speak against the foreign accusation of everything bad about Islam. It’s the Doctor. Dr. Who?? Dr. Mahathir. [here] He did it once again! Syabas!

Soviet Union foreign policy in perspectives

[An alliance may aim at augmenting ones insufficient power, or it may be intended to control the ally’s use of power even while supplementing it. U.S.S.R. foreign policy in perspectives.]

By: Ahmad Syah Ejaz Bin Hj. Ismail


Soviet Union is considered as one of the main empires of history, equal to Notables Empires such as the British Empire and the Roman Empire. [1]U.S.S.R. borrowed most of its foreign policy from the previous Tsarist Russia Empire. Most of the Russian foreign policy is motivated by its own policy references which determined Russia behaviour.

Scholars argued that Soviet Union carried the same principal of world empires due to their tendencies of such act below:-

i. Territorial expansion through invasion or subversion (e.g.: Caucasus, Central Asia, Poland, Finland, or the Baltic States);
ii. Strong Central government [2]controlling the governments of subsidiary and satellite territories; and
iii. Interference (including through the use of military force) in the internal politics of its allies (e.g.: Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Afghanistan).


U.S.S.R. tries hard to get recognition from the world community through its decision of submitting to the United Nations after the World War II. As one of the greatest superpower through its vast armies, Soviet Union had used its [3]veto rights in the U.N. Security Council resolutions mainly for the purpose of World Communism and preserving the world Socialist systems.

Most of the conflict between ideologies of U.S.S.R. and the United States was their drive to get geopolitical influences from the world community. While the United States signed [4]treaties to form alliances with its World War II allies and the Third World countries to repel the influence of the World Communism, the U.S.S.R. verge an alliance of its own World Socialist system states to counter the United States power, NATO alliance, and the Capitalist states.

The two main drives of the U.S.S.R. ideology and objectives which determines its behaviour towards the world community are it’s believe in the [5]proletariat internationalism and its effort for peaceful coexistence with the world. The basic character of Soviet foreign policy was set forth in Vladimir I, Lenin’s Decree on Peace, which adopted by the Second Congress of Soviets in November 1917. Proletariat internationalism refers to the common cause of the working classes of all countries in struggling to overthrow the bourgeoisie and to establish communist regimes.

Peaceful coexistence refers to measures to ensure relatively peaceful government-to-government relations with Capitalist states. Both policies can be pursued simultaneously. “Peaceful coexistence does not rule out but presupposes determined opposition to imperialist aggression and support for peoples defending their revolutionary gains or fighting foreign oppression”.

According to the Twenty-Seventh Party Congress which was held in February-March 1986, “The main goals and guidelines of the [6]CPSU’s international policy included; 1) Ensuring favourable external conditions conducive to building communism in the Soviet Union; 2) Eliminating the threat of World War; 3) Disarmament; 4) Strengthening the World Socialist system; 5) Developing equal and friendly relations with “liberated Third world countries”; 6) Peaceful coexistence with the Capitalist countries; and 7) Solidarity with Communist and revolutionary-democratic parties, the international worker movement, and national liberation struggles.

Although the emphasis and ranking of priorities were subject to change, two basic goals of Soviet foreign policy remained constant which were; 1) National security (safeguarding CPSU rule through internal control and the maintenance of adequate military forces); and 2) To influence over Eastern European neighbour to World Socialist systems through [7]military and [8]economic alliances.


Many analysts have examined the way Soviet Union behaves especially in forming alliances with various regions and countries. There are five main drive factors which determine and support the general goals of the Soviet foreign policy and its alliance. The factors were:-

i) Primary emphasis on relations with the United States (that considered the foremost threat to the national security of the Soviet Union);
ii) Second priority was given to relations with Eastern Europe (the European members of the Warsaw Pact);
iii) Third priority was given to the littoral or propinquities states along the southern border of the Soviet Union such as:-
· Turkey (a NATO member),
· Iran,
· Afghanistan,
· People’s Republic of China,
· Mongolia,
· [9]The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and
· Japan.

iv) Fourth priority was given to the regions near to, but not bordering the Soviet Union; and
v) Last priority was given to the Sub Saharan Africa, the islands in the Pacific, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.

In general, Soviet foreign policy was most concerned with superpower relations (and, more broadly, relations between members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact). Soviet foreign policy and political or military alliance is seen by observers mainly to strengthen Soviet fragile Communism idea based on the span time of its conceptions which embraces Socialist system in contrast with the political and economic idea during the Tsarist Russia.

After millions of people died during the Russia revolutions in 1917 and the World War II with Nazi’s Germany (which includes the most brightest, and bureaucratic personnel), Soviet Union seems to be very much in the states of brain drain. Post World War II period sees the Soviet Union need to counter the threat of the Capitalist system not by absolving through another World War, but through [10]détente and proxy wars. That is why most of the alliances formed by the U.S.S.R. are intended to guard the special interest of the World Socialist system even while supplementing its ally’s through military assistance.


Moscow considered Eastern Europe to be a buffer zone for the forward defence of its Western borders and ensured its control of the region by transforming the East European countries into subservient allies. Such can be seen through the formation of the Warsaw Pact on May 14, 1955. This treaty signed solely as a counter balance of the [11]NATO treaty of the Capitalist world system.

Officially named The Warsaw Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance, members of the Warsaw Pact pledged to defend each other if one or more of the members were attacked. The treaty also stated that relations among the signatories were based on mutual non-interference in internal affairs and respect for national sovereignty and independence.

Even though Warsaw Pact claims as such, a Soviet act towards its members such as Hungary and Czechoslovakia tells the different story. Soviet troops crush a popular uprising and rebellion in Budapest Hungary in 1956 an ended insubordination by the Czech government in 1968 only to strengthen the point that Soviet intended to control its Warsaw allies through the use of power even while supplementing it. It is evidences that the Warsaw Pact was created to counter NATO and North-West-East Germany. Such strained felt by Hungary and Czechoslovakia was unsuppressed when citizens of the Warsaw Pact members ended up by throwing their government out at the end of the 1980’s. In 1989, many Eastern European citizens were [12]tired of the Soviet dominations.

The Warsaw Pact which represents the Soviet Russia as the supreme commander and its encroachment towards its allies ceased and dissolved at a meeting in Prague on 1 July 1991. Efforts to control the Eastern European states were implement not just mainly through military alliances but also by forming an economic bloc which dominated also by the Soviet Union. Soviet Union efforts to extend its influence or control over many states and peoples through economic means resulted in the formation of a World Socialist system of states through an alliances and economic treaty. Established in 1949 as an economic bloc of Communist countries led by Moscow, the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) served as a framework for cooperation among the planned economies of the Soviet Union, its allies in Eastern Europe and, later Soviet allies in the Third World. The military counterpart to the COMECON was the Warsaw Pact.


The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) membership is much and significantly wider than the Warsaw Pact. All COMECON members were “united” by a commonality of fundamental class interest and the ideology of Marxism-Leninism and had common approaches to economic ownership (state versus private) and management (plan versus market). COMECON provided a mechanism through which its leading members, the Soviet Union, sought to foster economic links with and among its closest political and military allies.

There were three kinds of relationship besides the 10 full memberships-with the COMECON:-

i) Yugoslavia was the only country considered to have associate member status. On the basis of the 1964 agreement, Yugoslavia participated in twenty-one of the 32 key COMECON institutions as if it were a full member;
ii) Finland, Iraq, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Mozambique had a non-socialist co operant status with COMECON; and
iii) Ater 1957, COMECON allowed certain countries with Communist or pro-Soviet government to attend sessions as observers.

The primary factors in COMECON’s formation appear to have been Joseph Stalin’s desire to enforce Soviet domination of the lesser states of Central Europe and to mollify some states that had expressed interest in the [13]Marshall Plan, and which were now, increasingly cut off from their traditional markets and suppliers in Western Europe.

One of the stark evidence which shows that COMECON was mainly formed to safeguard the World Socialist systems which precipitated by Soviet Union was when Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland had remained interested in Marshall Plan aid despite the requirements for a convertible currency and market economies. These requirements, which would inevitably have resulted in stronger economies ties to Western Europe than the Soviet Union, were absolutely unacceptable to Stalin, who in July 1947, ordered these Communist-dominated government to pull out of the Paris Conference on the European Recovery Programme.

In 1950, Soviet Union began to move domestically toward autarky and internationally toward an “embassy system of meddling in other countries affairs directly” rather then by “constitutional means”. COMECON’s scope was officially limited in November 1950 to “practical questions of facilitating trade”. After Stalin’s death in 1953, COMECON began to discuss developing complementary specialities. However, when trouble arose with the Polish protests and Hungarian uprising it leads the U.S.S.R. to rethink COMECON economic issues and policy. The uprising lead to major social and economic changes, including the 1957 abandonment of the 1956-1960 Soviet five year plans, as the COMECON government struggled to re-establish their legitimacy and popular support.

After 1985, during [14]Gorbachev era, U.S.S.R. made too many commitments on too many fronts, thereby overstretching and overheating the Soviet economy. This era was the era of Perestroika (restructuring), the last attempt to put the COMECON economies on a sound footing. Bottlenecks and shortages were not relieved due to Perestroika, while the East European members of COMECON resented being asked to contribute scarce capital to projects that were chiefly of interest to the Soviet Union. Due to liberalization by 15 June 1988 that allowed COMECON countries to [15]negotiate treaties directly with the European Community (the renamed EEC), Eastern European began to exchange asymmetrical trade dependence on the Soviet Union for an equally asymmetrical commercial dependence on the European Community.

The final COMECON council session took place on the 28 June 1991 in Budapest, and led to an agreement to disband within 90 days. The reasons for its failure were the domination of the U.S.S.R. Soviet Domination of the COMECON was a function of its economic, political, and military power. The Soviet Union possessed 90% of COMECON members land and energy resources, 70% of their populations, 65% of their national income, and industrial and military capacities second in the world only those of the United States. The location of many COMECON committee headquarters in Moscow and the large number of Soviet nationals on positions of authority also testified to the power of the Soviet Union dominations within the organizations.


The alliances formed between Soviet Union and its Southern neighbouring countries also seen by critics is a means to strengthen the Soviet socialist system which states that might pose a threat to U.S.S.R. either by forming an alliance with the United States or embracing the Capitalist system. Even though NATO and the Warsaw Pact counties, never engaged each other in armed conflict, but they do fought the Cold War for more than 35 years often through [16]“proxy war”. One of the proxy war fought by the U.S.S.R. is the Soviet Afghan War in 1979. The Soviet Union decided to intervene militarily in Afghanistan in order to preserve its Communist regime by wiping out the Southern border threat of Afghanistan pro-Capitalist uprising.

On the context of Cuba in 1956, in seeing Cuba as a stepping stone to counter United States hegemonic power in the Western Hemisphere and West European threat, Soviet Union decided to form an alliance with Cuba during the Cold War by providing Cuba with Soviet markets and military aid. Even though in February 1960, Khrushchev’s aides had initially advise Khrushchev that Fidel Castro as untrustworthy American agent, Khrushchev agree to form an alliance by agreeing to the temporary purchase of the Cuban sugar in exchange for Soviet fuel.

During the Cuba missile crisis, even though Castro repeatedly had announced publicly that Cuba was a socialist republic and the military issues of Cuba became a matter of prestige for the Soviet Union, Castro himself was not consulted throughout the Kennedy-Khrushchev negotiations during the peak of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The unilateral Soviet decision in withdrawing the missiles and bombers wounded Castro’s pride and prestige later.

During the period of the 1970’s to 1989, although myriad bureaucracies were involved in the formation and execution of Soviet foreign policy, the major guidelines were determined by the Politburo of the Communist Party. The foremost objective of Soviet foreign policy has been the maintenance of hegemonic power over the Eastern European allies. Relations with the United States and Western European were also of major concern to Soviet foreign policy makers and, much as with the United States, relations with individual Third World states were at least partly determined by the proximity of each state to the border and to estimates of strategic significance. In 1985, it signalled a dramatic change in Soviet foreign policy when Gorbachev pursued conciliatory policies toward the West instead of maintaining the Cold War status quo.


1. For the Soul of Mankind : The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Cold War by: Leffler, Melvyn P. Hill & Wang, Pub 2007;
2. The New Cold War : Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West by: Lucas, Edward Palgrave, Macmillan 2008;
3. Absolute War : Soviet Russia in the Second World War by: Bellamy, Chris Alfred, Knopf Inc 2007;
4. Voices of Glasnost : Interviews with Gorbachev's Reformers by: Cohen, Stephen F., Heuvel, Katrina Vanden, W. W. Norton & Co Inc 1990;
5. Thirteen Days : A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis by: Kennedy, Robert F. / Schlesinger, Arthur Meier (FRW), W. W. Norton & Co Inc 1999.

[1] The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (abbreviated USSR, Russian: Союз Советских Социалистических Республик, СССР); tr.: Soyuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik, SSSR), also called the Soviet Union (Russian: Советский Союз; tr.: Sovetsky Soyuz), was a constitutionally socialist state that existed in Eurasia from 1922 to 1991.
[2] In this context U.S.S.R. alliance (The Warsaw Pact and the Comecon)
[3] 79 vetoes were used by the U.S.S.R. in the first 10 years.
[5] In Marxist theory, the proletariat is that class of society which does not have ownership of the means of production. Proletarians are wage-workers, while some refer to those who receive salaries as the salariat.
[6] The Communist Party of the Soviet Union
[7] Warsaw Pact
[8] Comecon
[9] North Korea
[10] Détente is a French term, meaning a relaxing or easing; the term has been used in international politics since the early 1970s. Generally, it may be applied to any international situation where previously hostile nations not involved in an open war de-escalate tensions through diplomacy and confidence-building measures.
[11] Formed on 4 April 1949
[12] Protest demonstrations broke out all over East Germany in September 1989. Initially, they were of people wanting to leave to the West, chanting "Wir wollen raus!" ("We want out!"). Then protestors began to chant "Wir bleiben hier", ("We're staying here!"). This was the start of what East Germans generally call the "Peaceful Revolution" of late 1989.
[13] The Marshall Plan (from its enactment, officially the European Recovery Program, ERP) was the primary plan of the United States for rebuilding and creating a stronger foundation for the allied countries of Europe, and repelling communism after World War II. The initiative was named for Secretary of State George Marshall and was largely the creation of State Department officials, especially William L. Clayton and George F. Kennan.

[14] Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev was the last General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the last head of state of the USSR, serving from 1985 until its collapse in 1991.
[15] Known as the "Sinatra Doctrine" was the name that the Soviet government of Mikhail Gorbachev used jokingly to describe its policy of allowing neighboring Warsaw Pact nations to determine their own internal affairs. The name alluded to the Frank Sinatra song "My Way"—the Soviet Union was allowing these nations to go their own way.

[16] A proxy war is the war that results when two powers use third parties as substitutes for fighting each other directly. While superpowers have sometimes used whole governments as proxies, terrorist groups, mercenaries, or other third parties are more often employed. It is hoped that these groups can strike an opponent without leading to full-scale war.

Friday, 18 April 2008

Bar Council's Dinner for Tun Salleh Abbas - KJ Factor

And this particular guy was there! Is he the man behind number one speech that night? I believe he is. I'm sick of this guy! For more photos please visits Jinggo here

Wednesday, 16 April 2008

It's tough I tell you that

17th April 2008 - It's really tough handling pressures and responsibility I tell you that. You'll wonder that why enough is never enough and why God seems to be ignorant of your prayers (or is it?). You'll wonder that what’s more could you do to be the normal being just like everybody else despite for everything that you've done and sacrifices. Abraham needs to sacrifice his son for the love of God and why should mine be easy? Not to mention Jesus and The Great Prophet of Muhammad himself that went through his tears for something that they are assigned to and not on their own personal covets. You know the answer you’re looking for but it seems that patience is diminishing. What could I do? Should I succumbed and never look back or should I be more patient just a little bit because I seem to be on the right track.

They say that it's an easy solution for me, make the decision and never look back. You’ve got it all, what else could you asked for? Just never look back and all your problems are settled. It's not that easy if you’re me. No guidance when I need one, or perhaps only that me myself just don’t want to listen and see. Old man told me yesterday that God won't forfeit His promise to me and I need not be worry and just need to be a little bit patience about it. But it's really tough I tell you that, it's really tough being the special one.

Monday, 7 April 2008

Dear Prime Minister Abdullah

Dear Prime Minister Abdullah, were you not too close to a great statesman during your time before such as Tun Dr. Ismail, Tun Abdul Razak and Tun Dr. Mahathir to learn by their examples?

Faces of Tun Teddy

Faces of Tun Teddy